Comparison
Schedull vs FET
Schedull is a browser-based school timetable tool for teams that want guided setup, account access, support, manual review, and exports in one online workflow. FET is free desktop timetabling software for users who want a powerful local application and are comfortable configuring detailed timetable data themselves.
Last updated: April 28, 2026 ยท Reviewed by the Schedull product team
Best fit
| Need | Better fit | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Browser-based workflow with accounts | Schedull | Use it from the web with project access, support paths, and no desktop installation. |
| Free local desktop application | FET | FET is free timetabling software for users who prefer a local setup and direct file-based workflows. |
| Guided setup for school staff | Schedull | Schedull focuses on guided project setup, teacher availability, manual review, exports, and support for schools. |
At-a-glance comparison
| Area | Schedull | FET |
|---|---|---|
| Deployment | Web-based SaaS. | Desktop application for supported platforms. |
| Pricing | Paid annual plans with published plan limits and support. | Free software licensed under GNU AGPL v3. |
| Setup style | Guided project workflow for classes, subjects, teachers, rooms, and rules. | Detailed local data configuration with many timetable options. |
| Teacher availability | Built into the school project workflow. | Supported through FET's time constraints model. |
| Manual review | Browser timetable review and manual editing workflow. | Desktop review with automatic, semi-automatic, and manual allocation options. |
| Exports | Plan-based exports for school sharing workflows. | Exports timetables to formats including HTML, XML, and CSV. |
| Support | Product support through Schedull contact and plan channels. | Project documentation, forum, and community resources. |
| Best for | Schools that want an online workflow and a guided product experience. | Technical users who want a free, powerful local timetabling application. |
Detailed comparison
Deployment and access
Schedull runs in the browser, so schools can work through an account-based product without installing a desktop application. FET is a local desktop tool, which is attractive when a school wants file-based control and does not need an online product workflow.
Setup experience
Schedull organizes setup around projects, classes, subjects, teachers, rooms, availability, and rules. FET offers a broad and flexible configuration model, which can be powerful for experienced timetable planners but may require more comfort with detailed setup.
Rules and availability
Both tools can model teacher availability and timetable restrictions. The practical difference is workflow: Schedull frames rules in a guided school setup, while FET exposes a large set of detailed time and space constraints in its desktop application.
Editing and review
Schedull focuses on reviewing generated timetables in browser views and then making manual edits where a coordinator needs judgement. FET also supports automatic generation and manual allocation, with output review handled in its desktop workflow and exported files.
Exports and sharing
Schedull exports are tied to its paid plans and school sharing workflow. FET publicly documents exports such as HTML, XML, and CSV, which can work well for users comfortable managing generated files.
Cost and support
FET is free software, supported by public documentation, forum activity, donations, and community resources. Schedull is a paid SaaS product, so the value is the guided workflow, hosted access, plan features, and direct product support.
Choose Schedull if...
Choose Schedull if your school wants a web-based workflow, guided setup, account access, support, teacher availability planning, manual review, and exports without asking staff to install and maintain desktop software.
Choose FET if...
Choose FET if you want a free local application, are comfortable configuring detailed timetable data, prefer file-based control, and have the time or technical confidence to learn a powerful desktop timetabling tool.
How to evaluate both tools
The best comparison is a test using your school's real planning pressure.
- Use the same class list, subject loads, teacher assignments, and availability in both tools.
- Include at least one shared teacher and one specialist room so the test reflects real conflicts.
- Measure how long setup takes, not only whether a timetable is produced.
- Review how easy it is to explain, edit, export, and share the final timetable.
- Decide who will maintain the timetable after the first version is generated.
FAQ
Is FET free?
Yes. FET describes itself as free software and is licensed under GNU AGPL v3.
Is Schedull a FET replacement?
Schedull can replace a desktop timetable workflow for schools that prefer a guided web product. FET remains a strong choice for users who want free local software and detailed configuration.
Which is easier for non-technical school staff?
Schedull is designed around a guided browser workflow, which may be easier for staff who do not want to install software or manage files. FET can be very capable, but its depth may require more setup confidence.
Should I test both before deciding?
Yes. Use a real timetable sample with teacher availability, shared rooms, and weekly subject loads. The better tool is the one your team can set up, review, edit, and maintain reliably.
Sources
This comparison uses public product pages and should be refreshed when either product changes pricing, deployment, or feature availability.